My Top 5 Twitter Pet Peeves

by Andrew Miller on 02/05/09

Personally, I like Twitter. I think that in the right contexts it is an amazingly useful tool for building relationships and facilitating communication. But my skin starts to bristle when I hear self-proclaimed social media experts talking about using Twitter for marketing as if it were the Holy Grail or a complete revolution in the way business will get done in the future. I find that many of these “gurus” fall into one or both of these categories:

  • Younger people in their first job after college who grew up with these tools in a social context but lack traditional advertising or marketing experience.
  • Traditional (perhaps older) marketers that are trying to re-brand themselves to avoid becoming obsolete.

If this describes you, my pet peeves probably apply to you.

1. Twitter is a tactic, not a strategy

Many self-proclaimed social media gurus advise clients to set up a Twitter account and start talking without considering microblogging’s role in larger business and/or marketing objectives. Twittering for business is useless (and potentially dangerous for your brand) without clearly defined objectives and a solid strategy.

2. Twitter is over-hyped

Despite what the echo chamber that is social media would have you believe, Twitter is not the marketing revolution that some people want it to be. That is, unless your target audience fits into one or more of the following categories: 1) Marketers (social media or PR folks), 2) Early Adopters/Techies, 3) Bloggers, 4) Journalists. The vast majority of internet users will never understand or want to sign up for something like Twitter. Unless you have a plan for reaching the masses through the “Twitterati”, your resources are best spent elsewhere.

3. Twitter is over-sold

It’s a shiny object that gets a lot of press. New users are still signing up in droves. But it’s still not an appropriate or useful communications channel in every situation. The old adage still applies, “When all you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.” Not every company is equipped or ready to jump on the Twitter bandwagon. Who are the right people within a company to be Twittering? Are there processes in place to handle different types of interactions with customers or prospects such as complaints, inquiries, or negative press?

4. Twitter is just technology

Marketing is a form of communications. The underlying current in communications is relationships. Fundamental human relationships are aided and advanced by various technologies over time, but the common denominator is people. Too many people are dazzled by the technology rather than focusing the relationships it enables, enhances, or corrupts.

5. Too much noise, not enough signal

Twitter certainly opens up new communications paths for people to connect and meet up, but for general communications purposes I have a hard time justifying the commitment required to carry on meaningful conversations. If I need an answer to a specific question, I use search engines. If I need to reach somebody, I prefer email or a phone call because I know they will get my message.

Don’t get me wrong, I love learning more about people I know, and even some I don’t know. But it’s hard to derive value from several hundred concurrent conversations and still contribute value to other users. Many people are following hundreds or thousands of people, and I just keep wondering how that is sustainable if the motivation is to create and build meaningful relationships. At what point does it become more like broadcast and less like a conversation?

Am I wrong?

There are plenty of success stories of people and marketers using Twitter to create value for their followers, the internet community, and themselves. In fact, I use it to communicate with a wide variety of people about several different topics. But lately I’ve seriously been weighing the costs and benefits and I am coming to the conclusion that Twitter is simply an interesting diversion at the moment, not a useful business tool (for me).

I enjoyed a solid conversation (on Twitter, natch) with @copelandcasati about her use of Twitter to make “friends & peers [she] otherwise would not have met.” @cjuon explained her strategy of following 1,000+ twitterers as a way to duck in and out of several conversations as if it were a cocktail party. @shawnsmith put together an awesome Twitter Primer and led a great discussion at the LA2M lunch today in Ann Arbor.

All of this is well and good. In fact, I agree with all of it. These people are experienced marketers with a solid track record. But perhaps I have a different perspective on building relationships with people.


You May Also Like:

  1. Twitter Account Consolidation
  2. Twitter Quitter
  3. Marketing on Twitter: Where’s the Beef?

4 Comments on » My Top 5 Twitter Pet Peeves

{ 4 comments… read them below or add one }

Bradley Robb February 5, 2009 at 2:09 pm

While reading this, I get an email inviting me to a litany of online marketing webinars. Near the top of the list is a presentation: Twitter as a Marketing, Communication & Branding Tool

shawn smith February 5, 2009 at 2:29 pm

This is a post that needs to be written. Thanks Andrew. Usually when I read a post that isn’t full-throttle for twitter, it’s written from the perspective of “I don’t get it, twitter is stupid.” Your post comes from the perspective of someone who understands the technology, has used it and wants to bring some of its users back to earth.

Twitter is a really fun tool, for someone like me. I’ve been exposed to a large number of people I did not even know existed before.

How many meaningful relationships I’ve built directly from Twitter is another story. Of the people who I’ve met or engaged with more than a few times, the number is sharply lower than how many people I actually follow. However, for people who have engaged me more than once, I’d be happy to meet with them in person and forge a more lasting relationship.

The great thing about Twitter, for me, is it has allowed me to make initial contact with someone, and vice versa, which would allow the chance at nourishing that relationship. Cold-calling or even emailing doesn’t have the same effect, imho.

The other nice thing about Twitter is that even if I don’t reach out to someone else or try to forge a relationship with someone I’m following, I use it to monitor new things other people are doing and get new ideas. It’s been a huge inspiration feed for me.

Is it the next revolutionary marketing tactic … I don’t know about that. I do think it has it’s place. Dell just recently started offering exclusive deals through Twitter (http://bit.ly/4fxFM6). Why that’s interesting is because it gets their customer base who would normally search deals on a deal site into a Twitter, where the open rate is nearly-automatic. (hopefully that makes sense)

I really think people need to start identifying the results instead of the possibilities. The reason I think people hype the possibilities is because that helps get more people interested in Twitter, which expands networks and the possible possibilities :) .

Twitter will expand in 2009, and I do believe in a number of ways to get some good ROI out of it. I think the numbers are going to be what speaks coming up.

Andrew Miller February 5, 2009 at 2:47 pm

Thanks for dropping by Shawn. All of the uses you mentioned are valid reasons for using and engaging with Twitter. My beef isn’t with the uses you described. The main problem I have is with people marketing ABOUT marketing on Twitter.

I’ve seen the news about Dell’s exclusive Twitter offerings, but I keep coming back to the relationship between the medium (Twitter) and the message (special offers).

My question is, is the Dell tactic a good case study simply because they are using Twitter as the delivery vehicle? I don’t think so, because in this case they are using Twitter as an opt-in channel and could just as easily use email or RSS. It doesn’t seem like they are taking full advantage of the relationships they are building on Twitter. It sounds like another push messaging tactic.

Catherine juon February 10, 2009 at 8:16 pm

I would add only that Twitter is not unique in this regard. As a whole, social media is being hyped as something unique in and of itself when it’s simply another channel for sharing your message.

All marketing (including social media) boils down to understanding what makes you unique, understanding who the best candidates are for what you offer, and understanding how to get your message in front of those people in a way that prompts them to take action.

If you can use Twitter to that end, great! If not, keep on looking for the shoe that fits…

Leave a Comment

Previous post:

Next post: